Being charged with an intention to defraud by false or misleading statement under section 192G of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) is a serious matter with potentially severe consequences. This offence involves making a dishonest statement with the intention of obtaining property, gaining a financial advantage, or causing a financial disadvantage to another person. This article will provide a comprehensive guide to this complex offence, covering key elements, potential defences, penalties, and steps to take if you're facing this charge.

Understanding the intricacies of the law is crucial for protecting your rights and navigating the legal system effectively. We'll explore the elements that the prosecution must prove, various defence strategies, potential penalties for a conviction, and steps you can take to avoid a criminal record.

What is the 192G Offence of Intention to Defraud by False or Misleading Statement?

The offence of intention to defraud by false or misleading statement, outlined in section 192G of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), targets individuals who make dishonest statements with the aim of deceiving others for personal gain. This offence is often associated with financial crimes, where individuals use false information to obtain property, secure financial advantages, or cause financial harm to others.

To be found guilty of this offence, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you made a statement that is false or misleading, that you knew it was false or misleading, and that you did so with the intention of defrauding another person. The statement can be made verbally or in writing, and it must be "material" - meaning it must be significant enough to potentially influence the actions of the person receiving the information. For instance, consider a situation where a person selling a car knowingly lies about its mileage to a potential buyer, hoping to get a higher price. This false statement, directly relevant to the sale, could be considered material and, if proven dishonest, could support a charge of intention to defraud.

The concept of "dishonesty" is central to this offence. The law in NSW defines "dishonesty" as acting dishonestly according to the standards of ordinary people, and knowing that your actions are dishonest by those standards. This means that the prosecution must not only prove that you made a false statement to gain something, but also that your actions would be considered dishonest by the average person.

What is a False or Misleading Statement?

A false statement is any statement, whether spoken or written, that is untrue. This might involve making up information, exaggerating facts, or leaving out important details that would change the meaning of what's being said. To illustrate this concept, let's say a person applying for a loan claims to have a higher income than they actually do. This false statement, designed to improve their chances of getting the loan, could be considered an attempt to defraud the lender.

A misleading statement can be trickier to define, as it doesn't always involve outright lies. A statement can be misleading even if it's technically true if it's presented in a way that creates a false impression or leads someone to believe something that isn't accurate. This might involve using ambiguous language, selectively highlighting certain facts while downplaying others, or making suggestions or implications that are not supported by evidence. For example, an advertisement for a weight-loss product might feature testimonials from individuals who lost significant weight but fail to mention that these individuals also followed a strict diet and exercise program. While the testimonials themselves might be true, presenting them without context could mislead consumers into believing the product alone is responsible for the weight loss.

What Must be Proved for a Conviction of an Intention to Defraud by False or Misleading Statement Offence?

To secure a conviction for intention to defraud by false or misleading statement, the prosecution must prove several key elements beyond a reasonable doubt. These elements ensure that individuals are not wrongly convicted based on misunderstandings or unintentional mistakes.

First, the prosecution must prove that you made or published a false or misleading statement or that you agreed to help someone else make or publish such a statement. This means that you were directly involved in creating or spreading the false information, either by saying it yourself, writing it down, or actively supporting someone else who did.

Second, the prosecution must demonstrate that the false or misleading statement was material. This means the statement was important enough that it could have influenced the decision or actions of the person who received it. For example, a minor exaggeration on a dating profile might not be considered material, but a false statement about a product's safety features could be.

Third, the prosecution must show that you made the statement with the intention of obtaining property belonging to another, obtaining a financial advantage for yourself or someone else, or causing a financial disadvantage to another person. This means you had a specific goal in mind when you made the false statement and that goal was to gain something or cause someone else to lose something.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the prosecution must prove that you acted dishonestly when you made the false statement. As mentioned earlier, "dishonesty" is judged by the standards of ordinary people. This means that the prosecution must convince the court that your actions would be considered dishonest by the average person. If the prosecution cannot prove all of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you cannot be found guilty of this offence.

Defences to the 192G Intention to Defraud by False or Misleading Statement Offence

Even if the prosecution can prove that you made a false or misleading statement, it doesn’t automatically mean you will be found guilty. There are several legal defences that can be raised to challenge the prosecution's case. If any of these defences are successful, they can lead to the charges being dropped or a finding of not guilty.

Honest and Reasonable Mistake of Fact Defence

One of the most common defences to fraud charges, including intention to defraud by false or misleading statement, is the defence of "honest and reasonable mistake of fact." This defence applies if you can show that you genuinely believed the statement you made was true and that it was reasonable for you to hold that belief, given the circumstances.

To illustrate this concept, let's say a shopkeeper sells a customer a product that is later found to be faulty. The shopkeeper had no reason to believe the product was faulty and had received assurances from the supplier that all products were in perfect condition. In this case, the shopkeeper might have a valid defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact, as they genuinely believed the statement they made about the product's condition was true.

It's important to note that the belief must be both honest and reasonable. If you simply didn't bother to check the facts or if your belief was based on flimsy evidence, this defence is unlikely to be successful. The court will carefully examine the circumstances surrounding the statement and your actions to determine whether your belief was genuinely held and objectively reasonable.

Duress Defence

The defence of duress applies when you are forced to commit a crime because you are under threat of harm. To successfully raise duress, you must prove that you committed the offence because you were threatened with death or serious injury, and that the threat was so serious that it would have compelled a person of ordinary firmness of mind to act in the same way.

For example, imagine a bank teller who is forced to hand over money to a robber because the robber is holding a gun to their head. In this situation, the teller's actions were not voluntary, as they were compelled by the threat of immediate harm. If charged with a crime related to handing over the money, the teller could raise the defence of duress.

It's important to note that the threat must be immediate and serious. A vague threat of future harm is unlikely to be sufficient to establish duress. The court will consider the nature of the threat, the imminence of the danger, and whether there were any reasonable alternatives to committing the crime.

What are the Penalties for an Intention to Defraud by False or Misleading Statement Offence in NSW?

The penalties for an intention to defraud by false or misleading statement offence in NSW can be severe, reflecting the seriousness with which the law views fraudulent conduct. The potential punishments range from less serious options like fines or community service to more severe penalties like imprisonment. The specific penalty imposed will depend on a number of factors, including the severity of the offence, the value of the property or financial advantage involved, and the offender's criminal history.

Maximum Penalties for Intention to Defraud Offence

The maximum penalty for this offence, as outlined in section 192G of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), is five years imprisonment. This maximum sentence is reserved for the most serious cases, where significant harm was caused or where the offender has a history of similar offences. However, even in less serious cases, a conviction for this offence can have significant consequences. For instance, consider a situation where a person with no prior criminal record is convicted of making a false statement to obtain a small loan. Even though the financial gain was relatively minor, the conviction could still result in a criminal record, potentially affecting their future employment prospects or ability to travel to certain countries.

What Factors Affect Sentencing for an Intention to Defraud Offence?

When determining the appropriate sentence for this offence, the court takes into account a variety of factors, aiming to impose a penalty that is fair and proportionate to the circumstances of the crime. Some of the key factors that influence sentencing decisions include:

• The value of the property or financial advantage involved: Generally, offences involving larger sums of money or more valuable property are considered more serious and may result in harsher penalties.
• The level of planning and sophistication: Offences that were carefully planned and executed are often viewed more seriously than impulsive or opportunistic acts. For instance, a complex scheme to defraud investors would likely be treated more seriously than a single instance of lying on a job application.
• The impact of the offence on the victim: The court will consider any harm or loss suffered by the victim as a result of the false statement. If the victim experienced significant financial hardship, emotional distress, or damage to their reputation, this could lead to a more severe penalty.
• The offender’s remorse and prospects for rehabilitation: If the offender demonstrates genuine remorse for their actions and takes steps to make amends or address any underlying issues that contributed to the offence, this can be a mitigating factor in sentencing. To illustrate this concept, let's say an offender who made a false statement to obtain a benefit repays the money they fraudulently obtained and seeks counselling to address a gambling addiction. These efforts could be seen as positive signs of rehabilitation and might influence the court to impose a more lenient sentence.
• The offender’s criminal history: Offenders with prior convictions, particularly for similar offences, are often subject to harsher penalties. This reflects the principle that repeat offenders have not learned from past mistakes and may pose a greater risk to the community.

It's important to understand that sentencing is a complex process and that each case is assessed on its individual merits. The court has a degree of discretion in determining the appropriate sentence, and the specific outcome will depend on the unique circumstances of the offence and the offender.

How to Avoid a Criminal Record for an Intention to Defraud by False or Misleading Statement Charge

Facing a charge of intention to defraud by false or misleading statement can be daunting, especially given the potential impact on your future if you receive a criminal conviction. However, it's important to remember that being charged does not automatically mean you will be found guilty or that you will inevitably end up with a criminal record. There are steps you can take to increase your chances of avoiding a conviction and minimising the long-term consequences of this charge.

Pleading Guilty

If you believe the prosecution has a strong case against you and you are likely to be found guilty, pleading guilty might be the most strategic option. While this might seem counterintuitive, pleading guilty early in the legal process can demonstrate remorse and a willingness to accept responsibility for your actions. This can be a mitigating factor in sentencing and could potentially lead to a more lenient outcome.

For instance, consider a situation where a person is charged with making a false statement to obtain a financial benefit. If they plead guilty early and express genuine remorse, the court might be more inclined to impose a less severe penalty, such as a fine or a good behaviour bond, rather than a prison sentence.

It's crucial to understand that pleading guilty should not be taken lightly and should always be done in consultation with an experienced criminal lawyer. A lawyer can advise you on the potential consequences of pleading guilty, help you negotiate with the prosecution for a more favourable outcome, and present your case in the best possible light during sentencing.

Section 10 Dismissal for Avoiding a Criminal Record

In some cases, it might be possible to avoid a criminal conviction altogether through a Section 10 dismissal. This provision, available under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), allows a court to dismiss a charge without recording a conviction, even if the defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty.

To be eligible for a Section 10 dismissal, the court must be satisfied that it is in the best interests of justice to do so. This decision is based on a range of factors, including the nature of the offence, the defendant's character and criminal history, and the potential impact a conviction would have on their future.

To illustrate this concept, let's say a young person with no prior criminal history is charged with making a false statement to obtain a small amount of money. If the court is satisfied that the offence was out of character, that the young person is genuinely remorseful, and that a conviction would have a disproportionately negative impact on their future employment prospects, a Section 10 dismissal might be granted.

It's important to note that Section 10 dismissals are not automatic and require strong legal representation to be successful. An experienced lawyer can present a compelling case to the court, highlighting the mitigating factors and explaining why a dismissal is the most appropriate outcome in your specific circumstances.

Conclusion

An intention to defraud by false or misleading statement charge in NSW is a serious offence with significant potential penalties. Understanding the elements of this offence, the available defences, and the potential consequences of a conviction is crucial for anyone facing this charge.

While the legal process can be complex and stressful, seeking early legal advice from an experienced criminal lawyer is essential for navigating the legal system effectively and achieving the best possible outcome. A lawyer can guide you through the process, explain your options, and advocate for your rights, increasing your chances of avoiding a conviction or minimising the long-term impact on your life.

Frequently Asked Questions